Saturday, May 05, 2007

Power plays

Everybody is questioned by someone at least once in their life. All of us learnt to take it in our stride though not many of us like it. In a workplace, the questioning tone, however mild it might be always leads to some uncomfortable moments. I am reminded of an incident when I had initially started working. There was a huge gap in the required off-site materials requirement and the on-site one in a construction project. Since I had calculated the off-site requirement, I was questioned so many times during the course of the work. Now, I am not saying I am perfect in whatever I do. But, at that time I was just a fresher starting up. There were levels of people above me. But at the time of questioning, I somehow got caught in quagmire. It was not a very pleasant experience, to put it lightly. A little bit of transparency would have helped. I never got to know the end result of the entire process as I quit the job. Many would think this as an escapist tendency. But I view it differently. If I work in a place where a number of people are involved, I am answerable to my superiors. But the incessant questioning as though I have committed a crime will never elicit a response from me. The actual culprit of the whole situation needs to be found other than killing the most available goat nearby.

I was thinking of this phase of my life as I seem to have come to a somewhat similar situation once again. I am the very end of my research work now and I have presented my work at a major conference also. But as responses start to pour in. I am being asked why there is a difference in results between one method and the next. Now, I am prepared to answer these questions, but I somehow feel very annoyed and most of all, I feel I don’t have it in me to answer questions. Criticisms, the constructive ones, I am willing to take. But why is it that, everybody doubts something different? Does something different suggest it is wrong? At one point, I felt, I will accept that what I did is wrong, and then all this would get over. But it doesn’t work this way, I guess. This is not the right attitude, I am told. Unfortunately, I too know that. But somehow, it is like being trapped in the eyepiece of a hunter’s gun. I know the shot is coming, but why not make it less painful. Once, I am in a position of power, maybe I too will become like this. But I sincerely hope, I do not ….

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

hmmmmmm.... these things do happen... the key thing is to not take criticism too seriously.... ppl will tell u they dont think u r right.. thats their point of view... and when someone in a position of authority does that, we are bound to doubt ourselves... but again u have to learn to fend off those feelings and keep doing ur work.... If you can justify your work to you (and your professor), that should be enough for you... ppl will always have conflicting views.... but if we stop fighting, there would be no Einsteins and Newtons... everyones work is criticized at some stage....

maybe i have told u this before.... "key thing is that you enjoy the journey.. not the destination" if u have enjoyed the journey... well...

The_Girl_From_Ipanema said...

I am being asked why there is a difference in results between one method and the next.

Yeah, often the question could be stemming from scientific curiosity and not really an offensive stance. I also find it hard to deal with questions posed in a way of "Attack", but many people do it- especially in my post-defense exam, my committee was pretty much on the "Attack" mode. i got a bit irritated but think now it's one way of people testing your mettle.

But coming back to the question, it is very possible that two methods yield two different results, and it is an important finding and contribution in itself. Good on you for making others in your community aware of that. It would do you good to think of the reasons behind that, though. No, you are not wrong, but the two methods could have inherent biases or differences that make the results different?

Nice post. and thanks for answering my poll on my blog :-). and sorry for the long comment! ;)

A.S.Nandagopalan said...

We all face criticism in all walks of life. The ones without the powers have enough labels ranging from scapegoats, pawns to guinea pigs etc. while the ones wielding the power often have the ability to sweep important maters under the carpet. That explains why, more often than not, people whom you call as "actual culprit"(s) cannot be brought to the book. Pity that the accused/victim is often the judge. Really difficult to justify classification of criticism as constructive or otherwise. By making a decision to that end, the accused/victim leaves him/her self vulnerable to more bombardment because ultimately, what one feels and expresses in retaliation is not necessarily what they were told, but how they interpreted what was told. Always follow your instincts and gut feeling. "Opinions are welcome, but the decisions are mine."

If I had to comment in one sentence, I would have said, "The answers for at least half of the world's questions are questions." Eg. Q- "Why is there a difference in results obtained from your method and mine?" A- "How exactly does your method work? Do you have any documentation which I can read, do you have any test cases on which you tried this?" It's worth trying, it sometimes puts an end to conversations which you would rather never have. Not at all sorry for the long comment!! Not trying to make a point, to you or anyone else for that matter :). Have fun!

The_Girl_From_Ipanema said...

did u just have a happy budday? happy budday if so!

Neethi said...

All of you-
Thanks for the comments. I am too swamped to reply right now and yes, it is my birthday today. Thank you

Sathej said...

Hello,
There is a small difference between the two situations you have written about.In the former,you were part of a team and it was rather unfair for people to contantly question you.If they didn't have confidence in your abilities,they shouldn't have taken you aboard in the first place.
The second is an academic situation.Here,everything is questioned.And one is answerable for everything.This,in a way,constitutes part of academic honesty as one cannot get away with things,no matter what his staure is.Even papers presenting 'out of the ordinary' ideas by eminent people are whetted thoroughly.Peer review is of great importance.But,yes,it sometimes gets on to one's nerves when everything gets questioned.But,I guess,these are things we just have to get used to.
Sathej